Print
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice:
Effective August 1, 2017 the role of Change Management Administrator (CMA) of the Local Number Portability Administration Working Group (LNPAWG) for all US Regions was transferred to Telcordia Technologies, Inc., d/b/a iconectiv.
To contact the iconectiv CMA or to be added/removed from the LNPAWG distribution list please email cma@iconectiv.numberportability.com.
Please note that on or about September 30, 2017 the collection and history of industry documents will be transferred to https://numberportability.com/. Stay tuned for further updates at upcoming LNPAWG meetings and conference calls.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Problems and Issues Management
In late 1999, the LNPA WG established a "problem identification and management process" (PIM) for LNP issues. The LNPA WG is not responsible for resolving all LNP problems. The LNPA WG does an initial evaluation of each LNP problem submitted, then either develops a resolution for the issue or refers the issue to the appropriate forum for resolution. The status of each LNP issue submitted is reported to the NANC on a regular basis.
The LNPA WG has developed issue submittal guidelines, an issue submittal form, process flows, and a tracking mechanism. Issues should be submitted to the LNPA WG, using the issue submittal form, at least two weeks before the LNPA WG meeting at which LNP issue's discussion is desired.
-
PIM_102
During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These issues relate to a nonconformance to Industry Specification(s), an undocumented capability or feature, or a difference of interpretation (between LNPAs) of an Industry Specification. The specific issue herein needing resolution concerns recovery Active SVs that were modified. The modified SV data recovered was different than the local system was expecting.
Download the document PIM_102
-
PIM_101
During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These issues relate to a nonconformance to Industry Specification(s), an undocumented capability or feature, or a difference of interpretation (between LNPAs) of an Industry Specification. The specific issue herein needing resolution concerns the SV Query Response for an Audit. The local system SV Query Response did not match the specifications.
Download the document PIM_101
-
PIM_100
During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These issues relate to a nonconformance to Industry Specification(s), an undocumented capability or feature, or a difference of interpretation (between LNPAs) of an Industry Specification. The specific issue herein needing resolution concerns recovery of Service Provider Relative Distinguished Name (RDN). The RDN did not match specifications.
Download the document PIM_100
-
PIM 99
During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These issues relate to a nonconformance to Industry Specification(s), an undocumented capability or feature, or a difference of interpretation (between LNPAs) of an Industry Specification. The specific issue herein needing resolution concerns an SV Query Response Relative Distinguished Name (RDN). The RDN did not match specifications.
Download the document PIM 99
-
PIM 98
During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These issues relate to a nonconformance to Industry Specification(s), an undocumented capability or feature, or a difference of interpretation (between LNPAs) of an Industry Specification. The specific issue herein needing resolution concerns recovery of Network Data delete transactions. The local system expected optional attributes to be present in the recovered data.
Download the document PIM 98
-
PIM 97
During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These issues relate to a nonconformance to Industry Specification(s), an undocumented capability or feature, or a difference of interpretation (between LNPAs) of an Industry Specification. The specific issue herein needing resolution concerns Modifying the Old SP Authorization by the Old SP. The local system expected different results than were exhibited.
Download the document PIM 97
-
PIM 96
During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These issues relate to a nonconformance to Industry Specification(s), an undocumented capability or feature, or a difference of interpretation (between LNPAs) of an Industry Specification. The specific issue herein needing resolution concerns recovery of Network Data objects. The Local System expected optional attributes in recovery messages.
Download the document PIM 96
-
PIM 95
During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These issues relate to a nonconformance to Industry Specification(s), an undocumented capability or feature, or a difference of interpretation (between LNPAs) of an Industry Specification. The specific issue herein needing resolution concerns Disconnect Requests with Effective Release Date in the Past. Local System expected behavior does not match specifications.
Download the document PIM 95
-
PIM 94
During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These issues relate to a nonconformance to Industry Specification(s), an undocumented capability or feature, or a difference of interpretation (between LNPAs) of an Industry Specification. The specific issue herein needing resolution concerns scoped and filtered queries for SVs including a NOT filter. NOT filters are not required to be supported in the specifications.
Download the document PIM 94
-
PIM 93
During iconectiv LNPA transition testing of a local system, issues were discovered that impacts the execution and/or verification of an Industry Test Case (ITC) required for certification. These issues relate to a nonconformance to Industry Specification(s), an undocumented capability or feature, or a difference of interpretation (between LNPAs) of an Industry Specification. The specific issue herein needing resolution concerns the creation of port-to-original (PTO) SVs. The PTO SV create message did not conform to the specifications.
Download the document PIM 93